Have
you ever wondered if your private education has been worth the money that
has been spent on it? Then wonder no more. The facts speak for themselves.
In
2010 former cabinet minister Alan Milburn produced a report on social mobility
in Britain, concluding that we are one of the least socially mobile
countries in Europe, largely due to educational inequalities. Only 7 % of
Britain’s population are privately educated yet over half of the cabinet attended
fee-paying schools. Three quarters of the coalition cabinet are millionaires
and Eton alone has produced 19 prime ministers.
Although,
to many, it is sobering to think that the annual fees for many private schools
are higher than the national average wage, this can give young
privately-educated men a sense of entitlement and confidence to know that their
brains are worth a minimum of £142,980 after leaving a fee-paying school.
Equipped
with a first-rate education, money in the bank and access to the ‘old boys'
network, it is a short step from a good university to an important job with
rich rewards. There is no way around it; privately educated people dominate the
top professions and according to Milburn, the barriers for those less
privileged are growing ever higher. Educational charity -The Sutton
Trust has said, "Children's levels of achievement are more closely
linked to their parents' background in England than in many other developed
nations."
With
the highest quality of teaching available in Britain's public schools and their
incredible wealth of facilities, it is not surprising that privately educated
children perform so much better than those in state schools. Independent
schools offer pupils the lowest teacher/student ratios with 1 teacher to every
9.4 pupils, allowing children to receive much more support and attention.
After-hours care, a range of comprehensive indoor and outdoor activities and
excellent sports are some of the other reasons that enable students to achieve
great results year after year. Privately educated children are four times more
likely than state pupils to get straight As at A-level, and more than three
times as likely to go to university.
In
mid-June Milburn will publish three further reports for the Coalition on social mobility and child
poverty. He will include one that focuses on the role of higher
education and the extent to which admissions policies should take greater
account of applicants' backgrounds. He has recently spoken out about the
subject saying that teenagers from poor backgrounds attending low-achieving
schools “had to work harder to get decent A-levels” than similar pupils brought
up by well-off parents.”
He
aims to have universities look into the context in which the applicant achieved
their results as well as the actual grades, specifically looking at the average
grade for their school. For example a B grade at an inner-city state
school may have the same gravitas as an A at a private school. Would this mean
that the elite universities would have to sacrifice their academic excellence
for the sake of government targets and political correctness?
Milburn’s controversial subject will no doubt provoke
anger among many people, including politicians, students and academics. Professor
Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at
Buckingham University, said “Politicians should not be meddling with
university admissions – they should be putting their energies into creating an
excellent and equitable schools’ system for everyone. Universities, like
Premier League football teams, should be allowed to select the best possible
talent among those available to them.”
It
has always been the case that advantaged young people are more likely to enter
selective institutions than the disadvantaged, in some cases as much as 15
times more likely. Just under half of the pupils accepted at Oxford and
Cambridge Universities come from the 7% of the population educated at private
schools and according to the Independent Schools Council “28.5% of those
studying medicine and dentistry at university have come from a private school.”
Spokesman
for the Campaign for State Education, Michael Pyke said "Courses like
medicine and architecture require considerable investment on the part of a
student and their family. The reason there are disproportionately high numbers
of private school pupils studying these subjects is not that they have had
superior advice, it is because these children come from well-heeled and
naturally ambitious families."
With
unpaid internship becoming an increasingly accepted route into a career, the
advantages of the wealthy do not stop after higher education. The family
connections that secure a decent internship and the means to survive without a
salary can mean a worry-free transition from university to the work place.
Despite Nick Clegg’s hypocritical attack on the inequality of opportunity in
April 2011, the job market still favours contacts over suitability or merit
.The fact cannot be ignored that not everyone has good contacts but it would
seem foolish not to use them if they are available to you.
It
is not only connections or grades that can land the ex-public school contingent
the best internships or indeed jobs in the country; unassailable
self-confidence, understated authority and judicious charm are almost solely
the reserve of the privately educated. Instilled from a young age with a sense
of entitlement, in the most part they follow old traditions and have impeccable
manners, not forgetting cut glass accents.
With
so few of the younger generation speaking RP, the privately educated stand out
from the crowd of Essex-esque accents that have taken over our TV screens. In
recessionary times, people aim to maximise their chances in exam
presentations, university and job interviews and as a result the number of
state educated individuals seeking elocution lessons has increased dramatically.
The plummy accent of the wealthy does not go unnoticed, as a recent study by
travel company Sunshine revealed that a pilot with an upper class accent is
much more reassuring than one with a regional twang. Sunshine co-founder Chris
Brown said: "We weren't surprised to find that the classic RP accent was
the most likely to make passengers feel safe, as it's a given that the 'BBC
accent' is the most widely accepted.”
There
will always be people who look upon the wealthy and privileged with animosity
but it seems that Britons are coming round to' posh.' With films such as The
Kings Speech and The Iron Woman, the emphasis on clarity of articulation and
correct pronunciation has increased. Television programmes such as Made in
Chelsea and Downtown Abbey have made aristocrats and the elite cool.
From
private schooling and top universities, it is only a short step to the heart of
the establishment. Nearly three quarters of judges, a third of FTSE 100 chief
executives, half of all senior journalists and a third of MPs are from wealthy
families who chose private schooling over state. Whether you’re a dentist,
architect, doctor or pilot you can rest assured people will feel safe in your
imperious hands while listening to your elitist voice.

No comments:
Post a Comment